The authors reveal that benefits have emerged in both school-age and pre-school children. These findings are completely the opposite to what critics predicted - they feared parents would smoke more at home if they could not do so in pubs, at work or other enclosed public places.
Dr. Jill Pell, University of Glasgow, Scotland, one of the investigators, confirmed that the effect was the opposite to what critics said would happen. She added that people are now accepting that nonsmokers and children need to be protected from tobacco smoke. The legislation was, in fact, followed by more voluntary restrictions on household smoking.
Reductions in asthma-related hospital admissions since 2006 were:
- 18.4% among preschool children
- 20.8% among school-age children
Dr. Pell and team gathered data on childhood asthma hospital admissions and asthma deaths dating from the beginning of 2000 up to October 2009, during which five children died of asthma. During that period there were 21,415 childhood asthma related hospital admissions (aged up to 15 years).
From 2000 to 2002 the number of admissions dropped slightly, and then started to rise, peaking in 2006 when the new legislation came into force. From 2006 onwards hospitalization rates started to plummet.
The researchers could not determine whether the drop in asthma hospitalization rates were due to less smoke in enclosed public places or at home. They added that a drop in smoking among schoolchildren could also have been a contributory factor - smoking among schoolchildren dropped from 5% among 13-year-old schoolboys in 2004 to 3% in 2007.